Technologies

Multi-stack on purpose

We do not have a house framework to sell you. The right technology is the one that fits your problem, your team's skills and your hiring market once we have handed over.

  • 8 practice areas
  • No vendor lock-in
  • Hire-able skill sets

How we choose technology

Boring where it counts

Novel technology is reserved for the part of your product that is genuinely novel. Everything else runs on tools with a decade of operational history.

Hire-able by you

We will not leave you with a stack you cannot recruit for. If your market has ten React developers and one Elm developer, that decides it.

Exit paths documented

Every significant dependency comes with a written answer to "what would it take to replace this?" — before it is adopted.

The stack

What we build with

Grouped by practice. Anything listed here is running in production for a client today — we do not list technologies we have only piloted.

Interfaces built to a performance and accessibility budget, on frameworks chosen for the product rather than for fashion.

React Primary UI library
Next.js SSR & edge rendering
TypeScript Type safety end to end
Vue Nuxt & composition API
Svelte Lightweight interfaces
Tailwind Token-driven styling
Vite Build tooling
Storybook Component documentation

Engineering standards

Gates that fail the build

Standards written down but not enforced are preferences. Ours run in the pipeline, and a pull request that breaches them does not merge.

  • Performance budget. Largest Contentful Paint, bundle size and interaction latency thresholds per project.
  • Accessibility gate. Automated axe checks plus a manual assistive-technology pass before each release.
  • Security scanning. Dependency, container and secret scanning on every commit, with signed build artefacts.
  • Test coverage. Meaningful coverage on business logic; we do not chase a percentage on getters.
  • Architecture decision records. Every significant choice documented with its context and alternatives.

Delivery metrics we track

  • 12×median increase in deployment frequency
  • <30 minlead time from merge to production
  • −71%reduction in change failure rate

How we choose

Technology selection happens in discovery and is written up with the alternatives considered, the trade-offs accepted and the conditions that would make us revisit the decision. You keep that document whether or not you keep us.

Applied

These stacks, in production

Case studies grouped by the kind of engineering they required.

View the Orbit — real-time treasury platform case study
SaaS

Orbit Financial Group Fintech 2025

Orbit — real-time treasury platform

A multi-entity cash and liquidity platform replacing 40 spreadsheets and a nightly batch process with live positions across 14 currencies.

  • 18×faster daily close
  • 14currencies live-tracked
Read case study
View the Meridian — patient care companion app case study
Mobile

Meridian Health Network Healthcare 2025

Meridian — patient care companion app

An offline-first companion app for post-operative patients across 32 clinics, cutting readmissions through structured daily check-ins.

  • −23%30-day readmissions
  • 81%daily check-in compliance
Read case study
View the Northwind — headless commerce replatform case study
E-commerce

Northwind Outfitters Retail 2024

Northwind — headless commerce replatform

A headless storefront over an existing commerce backend, rebuilt for speed and mobile conversion ahead of peak season.

  • +31%mobile conversion rate
  • 1.1slargest contentful paint
Read case study

Available for new engagements

Not sure which stack fits?

That is a discovery question, and we answer it with evidence rather than preference. Tell us the constraints and we will tell you what we would choose.

  • Reply within one business day
  • No obligation, no sales sequence
  • NDA on request before we talk