Boring where it counts
Novel technology is reserved for the part of your product that is genuinely novel. Everything else runs on tools with a decade of operational history.
Technologies
We do not have a house framework to sell you. The right technology is the one that fits your problem, your team's skills and your hiring market once we have handed over.
Novel technology is reserved for the part of your product that is genuinely novel. Everything else runs on tools with a decade of operational history.
We will not leave you with a stack you cannot recruit for. If your market has ten React developers and one Elm developer, that decides it.
Every significant dependency comes with a written answer to "what would it take to replace this?" — before it is adopted.
The stack
Grouped by practice. Anything listed here is running in production for a client today — we do not list technologies we have only piloted.
Interfaces built to a performance and accessibility budget, on frameworks chosen for the product rather than for fashion.
Services designed for throughput, observability and a data model that survives years of change.
Cross-platform where it fits, native where the product demands it — benchmarked on real low-end devices.
Retrieval, forecasting and analytics built with evaluation harnesses so quality is a number rather than an opinion.
Reproducible infrastructure, progressive delivery and cost governance built in before the first invoice surprises anyone.
The right store for the access pattern, with migration paths planned rather than discovered.
Gates that fail the build, and telemetry that pages a human only when a human is needed.
Research and systems tooling that produces components engineers can build from without guesswork.
Engineering standards
Standards written down but not enforced are preferences. Ours run in the pipeline, and a pull request that breaches them does not merge.
Delivery metrics we track
How we choose
Technology selection happens in discovery and is written up with the alternatives considered, the trade-offs accepted and the conditions that would make us revisit the decision. You keep that document whether or not you keep us.
Applied
Case studies grouped by the kind of engineering they required.
A multi-entity cash and liquidity platform replacing 40 spreadsheets and a nightly batch process with live positions across 14 currencies.
An offline-first companion app for post-operative patients across 32 clinics, cutting readmissions through structured daily check-ins.
A headless storefront over an existing commerce backend, rebuilt for speed and mobile conversion ahead of peak season.
Available for new engagements
That is a discovery question, and we answer it with evidence rather than preference. Tell us the constraints and we will tell you what we would choose.