Outcome agreed first
We define the commercial result and how it will be measured before scoping features.
How we work
Six stages, each with defined outputs and a genuine decision point. At every stage you can stop, change direction, or continue — and you own everything produced up to that point either way.
We define the commercial result and how it will be measured before scoping features.
If a sprint slips you hear it that week, in the delivery report, not at the milestone.
You have direct access to every engineer on your squad, in your channel.
Documentation is written as we go, not compiled in a panic at the end.
The six stages
Durations are typical for a mid-sized engagement. A two-week rebuild and a twelve-month programme follow the same shape at different scales.
01 1–2 weeks
We sit with the people whose work the software will change, map current and target workflows including the exceptions, and surface the constraints that never make it into a brief.
02 1–2 weeks
Discovery becomes a plan: architecture, scope boundaries, a costed roadmap with a stated confidence range, and an explicit list of what is not included.
03 2–5 weeks
Information architecture, interaction design and a tokenised component system — tested with real users and annotated for accessibility before engineering starts.
04 Ongoing sprints
Two-week increments, each ending in something demonstrable on a real environment. Trunk-based development, mandatory review, automated quality gates.
05 1–2 weeks
Load testing, security review, rehearsed cutover and a rollback plan. Releases are staged and observable, so problems are caught by monitoring rather than by customers.
06 Continuous
Post-launch, we measure against the outcomes agreed in discovery and iterate. Support retainers cover monitoring, patching and a monthly enhancement allowance.
Discovery in detail
Fixed-price software fails when scope is guessed. Discovery converts guesswork into evidence, and it is the reason our estimates land within about 15% instead of drifting.
Discovery deliverables
What discovery changes
During delivery
No status theatre. Here is the real rhythm of an engagement once the build starts.
The squad and your product owner agree the increment scope. Anything carried over is explained, not quietly rolled.
Written updates in your shared channel by 10:00 local. Blockers are flagged with a named owner.
Trunk-based development with mandatory review. Every merge deploys to a live environment you can use.
Performance budget, accessibility gate, test coverage and dependency health, sent whether or not you ask.
Working software on a real environment, not slides. Feedback goes straight into the next planning session.
Progress against the commercial metrics agreed in discovery, with a frank view on whether we are on track.
Process questions
Every increment ends on a live environment you can use, plus a demo. You have access to the board, the repository and the team channel throughout — there is no reporting layer between you and the people building.
On squad engagements you simply re-prioritise the backlog; there is no change-request process. On fixed-scope work, changes are quoted transparently against the agreed baseline.
Mandatory code review, automated tests, performance budgets and accessibility gates enforced in CI, and DORA metrics tracked per team. These are pipeline gates, not aspirations.
You hear about it from us first. We hold weekly delivery health reviews internally, and anything amber is raised with you in that week rather than at the milestone.
Available for new engagements
Two weeks, a fixed fee, and a plan you own outright. It is the cheapest way to find out whether the project you have in mind is the project you actually need.